CONCLUSION of Judicial/Inquiry commission.

CONCLUSION (Page 236)

The commission is of the view that the PTI was not entirely unjustified in requesting the establishment of a body to inquire into its suspicions and allegations regarding 2013 general elections. However after the recording of evidence and carefully going through all the material placed on record the commission finds as under in respect of each TOR.

TOR 3(a): Taking into account all the evidence on record, notwithstanding the shortcomings of the ECP as mentioned earlier in this report, the 2013 general elections were in large part organized and conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.

TOR 3(b): The plan or design to manipulate or influence the election has not been disclosed with any degree of specification by any of the parties to the proceedings nor is it discernible from the material placed before the commission. Allegations against those allegedly involved in the plan/design also remained unsustainable by the evidence on record.

TOR 3(c): When the entire context of the elections are considered along with the meaning of overall basis, despite some lapses by the ECP it cannot be said on the evidence before the commission that on an overall basis the elections were not a true and fair reflection of the mandate given by electorate.

Signed by: Chairman, Member I, Member II.

Supreme court Building, Islamabad. 22-July-2015.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “CONCLUSION of Judicial/Inquiry commission.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s